<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CASA spends money it doesn&#8217;t have</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theaq.net/2009/casa-spends-money-it-doesnt-have/-1750/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theaq.net/2009/casa-spends-money-it-doesnt-have/-1750</link>
	<description>St. Thomas University&#039;s Official Student Newspaper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:05:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Williamson</title>
		<link>http://www.theaq.net/2009/casa-spends-money-it-doesnt-have/-1750/comment-page-1#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theaquinian.net/?p=1750#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Read this in the paper edition this afternoon. The article currently reads like a conversation with Ella Henry or an opinion piece. Did the author contact CASA or investigate beyond the &quot;Canadian Education Project&quot; website? 
 
Perhaps a Part II next week. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this in the paper edition this afternoon. The article currently reads like a conversation with Ella Henry or an opinion piece. Did the author contact CASA or investigate beyond the &quot;Canadian Education Project&quot; website?</p>
<p>Perhaps a Part II next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Williamson</title>
		<link>http://www.theaq.net/2009/casa-spends-money-it-doesnt-have/-1750/comment-page-1#comment-1614</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theaquinian.net/?p=1750#comment-1614</guid>
		<description>Read this in the paper edition this afternoon. The article currently reads like a conversation with Ella Henry or an opinion piece. Did the author contact CASA or investigate beyond the &quot;Canadian Education Project&quot; website?

Perhaps a Part II next week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this in the paper edition this afternoon. The article currently reads like a conversation with Ella Henry or an opinion piece. Did the author contact CASA or investigate beyond the &#8220;Canadian Education Project&#8221; website?</p>
<p>Perhaps a Part II next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ella Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.theaq.net/2009/casa-spends-money-it-doesnt-have/-1750/comment-page-1#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Ella Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theaquinian.net/?p=1750#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Just to clarify one thing, STU&#039;s research ethics board said the survey is outside their jurisdiction, which is different from not approving it. They did say: &quot;However, for educational purposes, we wanted to alert you that the project as it is currently articulated raises multiple ethical concerns&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify one thing, STU&#039;s research ethics board said the survey is outside their jurisdiction, which is different from not approving it. They did say: &quot;However, for educational purposes, we wanted to alert you that the project as it is currently articulated raises multiple ethical concerns&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ella Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.theaq.net/2009/casa-spends-money-it-doesnt-have/-1750/comment-page-1#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>Ella Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theaquinian.net/?p=1750#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>Just to clarify one thing, STU&#039;s research ethics board said the survey is outside their jurisdiction, which is different from not approving it. They did say: &quot;However, for educational purposes, we wanted to alert you that the project as it is currently articulated raises multiple ethical concerns&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify one thing, STU&#8217;s research ethics board said the survey is outside their jurisdiction, which is different from not approving it. They did say: &#8220;However, for educational purposes, we wanted to alert you that the project as it is currently articulated raises multiple ethical concerns&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

